Noting with anxiety the statements of the Iraqi Vice President which shed doubts on UN
Resolution 833 pertaining to the demarcation of the Iraqi-Kuwaiti borders, and considering
such statements as a danger to the security of the region and of Kuwait, the foreign ministers
urged the international community to take the necessary steps to confront Iraqi defiance of
these resolutions, and called on Iraq to take the appropriate measures to prove its peaceful
intentions towards Kuwait and the neighboring countries in a manner that ensures the security
and stability for all countries of the region. The communique hoped that the plan for
distribution of basic humanitarian needs to the Iraqi people would be implemented in line with
UN Resolution 1153 which aims at easing the sufferings of the Iraqi people, and reiterated the
inalienable stance of the GCC member states vis-a-vis Iraq's independence, territorial integrity
and regional safety.
The communique expressed optimism about the outcome of the visit of the Iranian foreign
minister to the United Arab Emirates on May 22, 1998, and hoped that contacts between the
two countries would pave the way for a positive response from Iran with peaceful initiatives
that aim at the settlement of the problem of the three islands in line with international law
including Iran's acceptance of referral of the case to the International Court of Justice. The
communique reiterated the support of the GCC member states to the sovereignty of the UAE
over the three islands, and their absolute support for all peaceful measures that might be taken
for the restoration of the three islands to the UAE.
The communique noted that the GCC member states are anxious to maintain good relations
with Iran on the principles of mutual respect and non-interference in the domestic affairs of
others as well as refraining from resorting to force or threat as a way for the settlement of
disputes. The communique hoped that the contacts and bilateral meetings between the GCC
and Iran would yield positive results and pave the way for the solution of any differences
through peaceful means.
On the Middle East problem the communique expressed anxiety over Israel's intransigent
policy and its failure to carry out the agreements signed with the Palestinian National
Authority. It deplored the decision of the Israeli government to expand the geographical
boundaries of Jerusalem and to change its demographic structure, declaring that this
constitutes a flagrant violation of international law and the UN resolutions. The communique
deplored the Israeli policy aiming at expansion of Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian
and Arab territories, saying this constitutes violation of the principles of the Madrid conference
and the UN resolutions, in particular number 252. The communique praised the international
consensus on continuation of the peace process on the basis of the UN resolutions and the
land-for-peace principle in line with the resolutions 242 and 338 and resolutions of the Madrid
conference. It called for Israeli withdrawal from the Arab Syrian Golan Heights and
unconditional withdrawal from southern Lebanon in line with UN resolution 425.
The communique called on the sponsors of the peace process in the Middle East and in
particular the United States of America to redouble efforts for the salvation of the peace
process. It also called on the European Union to intensify efforts for realization of a just and
comprehensive peace in the region. The communique reiterated the importance of Israel
signing the treaty of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons and allowing inspection of its
nuclear installations by the International Atomic Energy Agency.
The communique expressed concern over the arms race between Pakistan and India, declaring
this would have an adverse impact on the security and stability of the region and urging both
countries to sign the Treaty for Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and settle their dispute
through peaceful means. The communique praised the decision of Pakistan to unilaterally
suspend nuclear tests and hoped that India would follow its example so as to realize stability
in the sub-continent and in south Asia.
The communique regretted the continuation of the armed dispute between Eritrea and Ethiopia
and called on the two African countries to settle their dispute through dialogue and peaceful
means. On Kosovo, the communique deplored the aggressive practices of the Serb forces
against Muslims and urged the international community to work for putting an end to such
practices. The communique expressed its condemnation of all kinds of violence and terrorism
and regretted that certain countries give shelter to terrorist elements, underscoring the
importance of differentiating between human rights and acts of terrorism.